Preprint / Version 1

The state of neurological physiotherapy in Spain: a national survey

Authors

  • Selma Peláez Hervás Servicio de rehabilitación (ICEMEQ), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • Alfredo Lerín Calvo CSEU La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Carlos Rodríguez López Sinapse Neurología
  • Ismael Sanz Esteban Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad Europea de Madrid
  • Marcos Moreno Verdú Université Catholique de Louvain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9726-8518 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62059/LatArXiv.preprints.640

Keywords:

Physiotherapy, Neurology, Neurorehabilitation, Survey

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent advances in neurorehabilitation and neurological physiotherapy, uncertainty remains regarding the practical application of different interventions. The objective was to determine the sociodemographic and professional characteristics of neurological physiotherapists in Spain and their relationship to the application of different therapeutic options.

Methods: A national survey was conducted, consisting of 14 closed-ended questions that collected sociodemographic information, academic and professional profile, and use of different interventions. Participants responded anonymously. Data from 849 respondents were analyzed, exploring the association between different professional characteristics and the use of interventions.

Results: The majority were women (75.27%), with a predominant age range of 21–40 years. Territorial representation was uneven across regions. 73.62% were exclusively dedicated to clinical practice, and the majority lacked experience or training in research (60–65%). The highest level of academic achievement was comparable among continuing education, postgraduate programs, and official master's degrees. The most frequently used intervention was therapeutic exercise/motor control (85.75%), followed by the Bobath concept (66.55%). Differences were found in the use of various interventions according to academic training, healthcare system, and work experience.

Conclusions: Neurological physiotherapists in Spain are predominantly young women dedicated exclusively to clinical practice. Differences exist in the use of therapeutic interventions between public and private healthcare systems and among different levels of postgraduate training or work experience, which likely influences the quality of care.

References

Partridge C, Edwards S. The bases of practice--neurological physiotherapy. Physiother Res Int J Res Clin Phys Ther. 1996;1(3):205-208. doi:10.1002/pri.59

Nielsen JB, Willerslev-Olsen M, Christiansen L, Lundbye-Jensen J, Lorentzen J. Science-based neurorehabilitation: recommendations for neurorehabilitation from basic science. J Mot Behav. 2015;47(1):7-17. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.931273

Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update 2019. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2020;15(7):763-788. doi:10.1177/1747493019897843

Kwakkel G, Stinear C, Essers B, et al. Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework. Eur Stroke J. 2023;8(4):880-894. doi:10.1177/23969873231191304

Novak I, Morgan C, Fahey M, et al. State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20(2):3. doi:10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z

Scrivener K, Dorsch S, McCluskey A, et al. Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2020;66(4):225-235. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.008

Te Velde A, Morgan C, Finch-Edmondson M, et al. Neurodevelopmental Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2022;149(6):e2021055061. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-055061

Dorsch S, Carling C, Cao Z, et al. Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving arm activity and arm strength outcomes after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2023;69(1):15-22. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2022.11.008

Gregory WJ, Burchett S, McCrum C. National survey of the current clinical practices of the UK rheumatology physiotherapists: A short report. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021;19(1):136-141. doi:10.1002/msc.1516

Nepal GM, Acharya RS, Coppieters MW, et al. The physiotherapy workforce in Nepal: A national survey. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023;29(1):69-82. doi:10.1111/jep.13729

García Pastor A, López-Cancio Martínez E, Rodríguez-Yáñez M, et al. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology for the prevention of stroke. Interventions on lifestyle and air pollution. Neurol Engl Ed. Published online March 2021:S217358082100033X. doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.05.020

Rahman Khan F, Vijesh PV, Rahool S, Radha AA, Sukumaran S, Kurupath R. Physiotherapy Practice in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Physiotherapists in the State of Kerala, India. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(5):405-410. doi:10.1310/tsr1905-405

Umeonwuka CI, Roos R, Ntsiea V. Current knowledge and practice of post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation: A cross-sectional survey of South African neurorehabilitation physiotherapists. South Afr J Physiother. 2022;78(1). doi:10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1624

Pin-Barre C, Hugues N, Constans A, Berton E, Pellegrino C, Laurin J. Effects of Different High-Intensity Interval Training Regimens on Endurance and Neuroplasticity After Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke. 2021;52(3). doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031873

Ballester BR, Maier M, Duff A, et al. A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2019;122(1):350-357. doi:10.1152/jn.00762.2018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Posted

2026-01-19

Data Availability Statement

Los datos no se han hecho públicos pero están disponibles a disposición del autor de correspondencia.